DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this site is intended to help individuals who have or think they may have allergies and/or asthma.  This information is intended to increase your understanding of allergies and asthma.  The information presented is not to be used to make a diagnosis or form any treatment plan.  Both diagnosis and treatment must be based on a complete history, a thorough physical exam, and appropriate skin, laboratory, and pulmonary testing done under the direction of a physician with experience in this area.  Dr. Sweet assumes no responsibility for any misuse of this information including but not limited to any loss or injury.

 

 

WHY

 After clearly stating I am not responsible for any problems resulting from the information in this web site, why on earth would I bother to spend my time producing it?  I have been on the internet for years and try to read every article and journal possible on both allergies and asthma.  The variety of sites available range from very scientific, peer reviewed and reliable (but unfortunately often very difficult for the average person to understand) to personal sites which are highly emotional, unreliable and dangerous to your health.  This site represents an attempt to fill the void between these two extremes.  It reflects up to date medical research but also represents my own experience and personal opinions.  The materials are presented in much the same way that I discuss allergies-asthma with my patients and represents an attempt to make this clearly understandable to the individual with allergies-asthma.  Please feel free to download or print any of this information.

 

WHO AM I

    It's very important that the reader understand not only my medical qualifications but have an appreciation of how I approach allergic problems.  When I was in my teens, I developed severe hayfever (ragweed) that literally almost killed me.  My life was turned around by an allergist and immunotherapy (allergy shots).  I was an allergy patient long before I was a M.D.  I graduated from university in Applied Science (engineering) and became a Professional Engineer working in the nuclear power industry, then subsequently retired from engineering (P.Eng.r) and decided to go into medicine.  I graduated from medical school in 1976 and began a general practice in northwestern Ontario in 1977.  Since 1977 I have had a special interest in allergies and asthma and have done allergy testing since that time.  My general practice gradually decreased over time, to the point where all of my time is spent assessing / testing / treating patients who have allergies-asthma.  I have always been firmly committed to educating every individual who has allergies-asthma because without a clear understanding of the basics, an individual will never learn to adequately cope with their disease and treat themselves appropriately.  I have a relatively unique outlook on the allergic process as I am a highly allergic individual myself (including anaphylaxis) and look at the allergic process from both the generalist medical and engineering viewpoints.  I am in my sixties now, and have reduced my practice, working 3 days per week from Sept. to May.  Without further rambling , lets get started.

 

THE ALLERGIC PROCESS

 When the body contacts a foreign substance (inhaled, ingested, direct contact, etc.) certain cells in the immune system of the body identify this substance and produce antibodies that can specifically identify and neutralize this foreign substance.  An example of this would be a bacterial infection causing a sore throat, the immune system produces antibodies against this specific bacteria, the infection is cleared, and the immune system settles back to normal.  We normally produce several different antibodies that have specific purposes: IgA, IgG, IgM, and IgE.  We are interested in the IgE antibody.  IgE is normally produced to fight parasitic infections.  The TH2 lymphocyte is responsible for controlling and encouraging the production of IgE.  The TH1 lymphocyte acts to balance the immune system and prevent over production of IgE.  In individuals with allergy the TH2 lymphocyte predominates which leads to an overzealous IgE response to substances such as dust mite allergen, pet allergen, pollens, mold spores, foods and drugs.  It takes several days for the immune system to identify and produce a specific IgE antibody to a specific substance (i.e. penicillin).  This is important, as you cannot have IgE antibodies to a specific substance unless you have had previous prior exposure or have been exposed for several days to allow the body to produce IgE.  The IgE antibody is attached to the surface of certain cells (mast cells, basophils).  The mast cell contains many small internal packages filled with chemicals. When IgE antibodies on the surface of the mast subsequently (on reexposure) identify the specific penicillin molecule, the mast cell immediately releases all its contained chemicals into the surrounding tissues.  These chemicals cause swelling and irritation in the affected tissues.  This is known as the acute or early phase reaction and is responsible for the immediate allergy symptoms seen when an individual who is cat allergic gets close to a cat (the eyes, nose, chest often are affected, because these tissues contain many mast cells, if the cat licks the skin you get a hive because the skin contains many mast cells) and this reaction is responsible for anaphylaxis (i.e. a severe penicillin or peanut allergy causes the mast cells in many different areas (skin, respiratory, heart, gut) to release all their chemicals at once).  However, some of these released chemicals don't cause immediate symptoms, but do attract other cells to the site of the allergic reaction.  These cells take approximately six hours to arrive, and once they are at the site of the allergic reaction, cause further swelling and irritation (inflammation) that can last for many hours to many days.  A cell that we are particularly interesting in is the eosinophil, which is linked with IgE production, and can cause long-term inflammation in the tissues.  This late inflammatory response caused by the eosinophil (and some other cells) is called the late phase or delayed allergic reaction and is responsible for the ongoing & continuous symptoms seen in chronic nose and sinus problems, and asthma.  Asthma is interesting, because once the inflammatory process is started, it tends to keep going on its own.  This occurs in individuals with chronic nasal allergy.This late phase reaction is also responsible for the secondary allergic reaction you occasionally see in anaphylaxis 6 to 12 hours after the initial reaction occurred.

               So now you have a basic understanding of the allergic reaction.  This reaction is caused by an over active response of the immune system, driven by TH2 lymphocytes, producing excess IgE to substances we normally don't, the IgE is highly substance specific, requires reexposure or prolonged exposure, this exposure results in a release of chemicals from the mast cell that results in an immediate, acute, early phase reaction and a secondary delayed late phase reaction produced by cells moving to and staying at the allergy site (particularly eosinophils) causing prolonged inflammation. This type of allergic reaction is termed type 1, immediate, IgE mediated.  There are other types of allergic immunologically mediated reactions, types 2, 3, and 4 and they will be mentioned later on when discussing specific allergy problems.  What is critical, is that you realize the allergic reaction causes inflammation.  There are reactions that cause mast cells to release their chemicals that are not mediated by the immune system (i.e. ASA can cause mast cells to directly release chemicals).  It is important to know whether a reaction is truly allergic (caused by IgE and the immune system) because we have good medications available to treat many true allergic reactions and allergy skin testing only confirms IgE reactions. You should also realize that the allergic response is an over aggressive immune system response (not a form of immune system weakness).  Perhaps an analogy will help.  The immune system is like a huge orchestra, made up of many different players (cells) each producing there own sounds (chemicals).  Normally all you see or hear is the total visual effect and sound of the orchestra-the normal immune response.  However, specific members of the orchestra can do solo performances (while the rest of the orchestra is still playing) and in the allergic orchestra the conductor is the TH2 lymphocyte, a common sound  heard is IgE antibody, and the mast cell does a solo performance in the immediate (acute) allergic reaction (examples would be anaphylaxis or the acute nasal/eye reaction on exposure to a substance one is allergic to (allergen)), while the eosinophil does a solo performance in the late phase (delayed, chronic) allergic reaction (examples would be chronic allergic rhinitis, asthma).

 

THE PROBLEM

 Allergies and asthma are increasing at a staggering rate.  Estimates for most western countries are that allergies and asthma have doubled in the adult population within the last 10 to 15 years, and likely tripled in young children in the same time span.  No other common disease process has increased so radically in modern times.  Estimates are that asthma alone is occurring in up to one in ten adults and possibly as high as one in five children in western countries.  This massive increase can only be caused by our environment (in the broadest sense) because our gene pool does not change this rapidly.  Another way of looking at the problem is why are individuals developing a primary TH2 lymphocyte response (remember this response increases IgE, allergies, asthma).  Many theories have been put forward, but these are mostly from epidemiologic-statistical studies that cannot precisely prove a causal relationship.  Some of these theories include: smaller family size, sibling order, immunizations, frequent antibiotic use, reduced number of specific infections (? bowel infections), various pollutants,  smoking during pregnancy, the striking increase in dust mite (cockroach in inner cities) allergens due to modern energy efficient carpeted housing, etc..  The “hygene hypothesis” is gaining popularity where a general reduction in childhood infections and reduction in exposure to certain markers of infection (endotoxin, etc.) allow the immune system to slide toward the TH2 response.  The answer to this question will likely be multifactorial and difficult to solve with one or two specific interventions.  We are sure, however, that this increase is truly occurring.  How we can reduce the TH2 response (or conversely increase the TH1 response) will be difficult to attain if we don't know the causes in the first place.

 

RESPIRATORY ALLERGY & ASTHMA

 

OVERVIEW

 It is important to have a broad understanding of the respiratory system to appreciate the allergic problems that arise.  The lining of the respiratory tract is fairly similar throughout. It is designed to pick up small particles on its surface mucus and then move this thin layer of mucus and particles back out the respiratory system (usually to be swallowed). The lining also functions to warm and humidify the air - particularly the nose.  When particles of a substance that one is allergic to land on the respiratory lining you develop allergic inflammation in and under the lining.  This inflammation causes swelling of the lining, excess mucus secretion, and nerve irritation.  Individuals will often have one symptom that will predominate at any given time and this frequently changes over time.  In the nose you get a plugged-stuffy nose, a runny nose, and sneezing. In the sinuses you get swelling-pressure, mucus production (post nasal drip), and pressure-pain-nausea. Swelling of the sinus openings leads to mucus retention and possible secondary infection of the retained mucus. If the lining of the nose is inflammed at the back and side of the nose, the eustachian tube starts here and runs up to the middle ear (the pressure equalizing tube for the middle ear) and involvement of this area results in recurrent ear problems, particularly in infants and small children. If the allergic process involves the larynx (voice box) you develop allergic laryngitis - your voice changes pitch or you lose your voice.  If the allergic process goes further down to involve the trachea (the large single air tube in the center of the chest) all you usually get is a cough, occasionally with slight mucus and central chest discomfort, but never any shortness of breath.  Continuing down the respiratory tract you get to the medium and small tubes of the lungs where the inflammatory allergic process causes swelling, mucus production, nerve irritation (cough), and the tubes become overly sensitive to a variety of allergens, stimuli and irritants and can narrow down causing wheezing or shortness of breath (asthma).  Similar to the sinuses, allergic inflammation sets up increased possibility of infection in the middle ear and lungs.  What is important, is that the entire respiratory tract is a continuum and it is very common for more than one area to be involved at the same time with the allergic inflammatory process.  It is not unusual for the allergic process to skip areas also (i.e. there may be signs of mild allergic nasal problems and asthma) with no evidence of any problems in between.  This is dependent upon the specific allergy particle, it's size, shape, aerodynamics, the type of breathing (mouth, nose, both), and a host of factors we likely don't understand.  An important principle, is that allergic inflammation (or infection) in the upper airway can adversely affect the lower airways and make asthma worse (the converse of this is also true, that controlling upper airway allergic inflammation improves asthma control).

 

SPECIFIC SYMPTOMS

  Little time will be spent on the standard symptoms that most individuals know.  A few comments are important.  It is very difficult at times to tell the difference between allergic nasal problems and a typical cold-viral infection.  Most viral upper respiratory infections start in the nose and track into the chest in approximately 48 hours.  Most have gone within 10 days.  If you have generalized aching and a low grade fever at the start it is likely viral.  Any significant fever makes the diagnosis of infection.  Allergy symptoms often last longer, and any "cold" lasting longer than 2 weeks is highly suspicious of allergy.  Any cold, cough, or respiratory symptom that returns seasonally is allergic until proven otherwise.  Sneezing usually represents allergy, particularly if it lasts more than a few days, and definitely if specific exposures trigger the sneezing.  Post nasal drip comes mainly from the sinuses, goes down the back of the throat, often is very tenacious and thick, and individuals with this problem frequently clear their throat.

 Cough has to be discussed more thoroughly.  The nerves that trigger the cough reflex are found in the back of the throat and all the way down the tubes in the lungs.  There are multiple causes of cough and it is not unusual for more than one cause to be involved.  Post nasal drip is a common cause of cough.  Allergic inflammation in the large central tube of the airways (allergic tracheitis) is often overlooked.  It frequently is seasonal and never causes significant difficulty breathing.  Asthma-the smaller tubes involved-often causes cough in association with mucus production, episodic wheezing or difficulty breathing, and occasionally cough (particularly at night, or with cold air exposure or exercise) is the only symptom (cough variant asthma).  Infection is an extremely common cause of cough and specific infections can cause coughing that lasts several weeks.  Reflux-movement of acid from the stomach into the esophagus (the tube you swallow food down)- can irritate the nerves supplying the esophagus and result in coughing.  Reflux also can make asthma worse.  Up to one third of people with significant reflux do not have any symptoms of heartburn.  After taking a careful history and doing a good physical exam, it's often appropriate to treat what you feel the main cause of cough is, and if the cough is eliminated, you have your diagnosis.  However, for individuals with chronic cough, further investigation and elimination of one cause at a time is often required.  Cough is often a huge problem for parents who cannot sleep with their child coughing, yet the child often is relatively unaffected, and severe fatigue can result from lack of sleep (see the subsection on  Cough).  Chronic cough associated with other constitutional symptoms (night sweats, weight loss) can indicate a serious disease process.  True wheezing usually indicates asthma.  The problem is that many individuals do not know what "wheezing" is.  This is a high pitched whistling sound that comes from the chest itself.    Wheezing occurs when the smaller tubes in the lungs are narrowed significantly.  This is not to be confused with stridor, which is the sound made when the throat or larynx are severely swollen and it is difficult to move air in and out.  Stridor sounds like someone is grabbing your neck and choking you.

 

ALLERGIC RHINITIS - THE NOSE

 Allergic inflammation in the nose occurs in 2 basic forms.  Seasonal allergic rhinitis-hayfever-occurs during a specific season and is usually caused by pollen or occasionally by seasonal molds.  It is often accompanied with allergic eye irritation-itching, tearing, pink to red color- allergic conjunctivitis.  Perennial or chronic allergic rhinitis occurs continuously throughout the year although it often is worse at certain times.  This is caused by chronic exposure to year round allergens (dust mite, pets, molds) or the individual has seasonal allergies for every season.  Because the nose is the entrance to the airway and acts as the main filter, many individuals with respiratory allergy start with allergic rhinitis.  Interestingly, many individuals do not notice this problem, either accepting it as normal or thinking they just have frequent or severe colds.  Again, no infection ever comes at the same time of year, repeatedly or usually lasts for more than ten days.  Allergic rhinitis is often associated with other respiratory allergy in the sinuses, ear, or chest.

 There are several other forms of rhinitis that you should be aware of.  Irritant rhinitis, caused by many and varied irritants is extremely common.  Chemicals of many kinds, smoke, solvents, cleaning agents, etc. can all cause chemical irritation of the respiratory lining.  This is a direct chemical irritant effect.  The treatment for irritant rhinitis is avoidance of the irritant.  Every individual with allergic rhinitis is more sensitive to irritants than non-allergic normal individuals.  This is an important concept.  If you have pre existing allergic inflammation of the respiratory lining, any chemical or physical irritant will cause more severe symptoms than in a normal individual.  A simple analogy is appropriate.  If you have no allergies, and take a cup of vinegar and pour it over your arm, nothing happens.  If you have allergies, the skin on your arm is inflammed by the allergic process, take sand paper and rub the skin on your arm until it is raw and oozing, then pour vinegar on the arm.  This is what irritants do to people with allergies.  Vasomotor rhinitis is also extremely common and can also occur with allergic rhinitis.  Vasomotor rhinitis is typically a profuse runny watery nose.  The nasal discharge is clear, and is usually triggered by changes in temperature, other physical stimuli (such as CPAP for sleep apnea), eating hot or spicy food, etc.  This type of rhinitis is caused by overactive nerves that supply the mucus secreting glands in the nose.

 Allergic rhinitis often presents as a plugged or stuffy nose.  Adults with allergic rhinitis often gradually develop allergic sinusitis over a period of years.  Only in recent years have we realized that the most important inflammatory response in allergic rhinitis is the late phase reaction driven by the eosinophil, which is why anti-inflammatory medication is the single best treatment. When the nose is primarily stuffy in the major or when getting up in the morning, it often signifies the individual is allergic to allergens in the home.  Seasonal allergies can often be identified if the individual clearly knows exactly when there nose flares.  Nasal symptoms appearing in the very early spring as the snow is melting or very late fall often identifies mold allergy, symptoms occurring later in the spring as things turn green and warm up often indicates tree pollen allergy, summer usually June-July is associated with grass pollen allergy, and early fall (Aug.-Sept.) usually is caused by  weed pollen allergy.  I am often quite surprised at how the allergic seasonal patient is not clearly aware of exactly when their symptoms occur.  What is critical, is that any suspected inhalant allergy must be confirmed by appropriate skin testing.  There are also huge variations in the timing of the appearance of specific allergens depending upon your geographic location.  This is why it is so important to be allergy tested by an allergist in your specific area that knows the details of the specific allergens in your area.  In my area, Thunder Bay, I run an aeroallergen collecting station, which gives daily readings of exactly which pollens and mold spores are in the air. Analyzing these results with weather conditions and the time of year allows allergists to form a good picture of the local aeroallergens. Please see the specific section on allergens & irritants for more detail.

 Treatment of allergic rhinitis is similar to the basics required to treat any allergic condition.  The primary treatment is ALWAYS avoidance first of.  When this is applied to indoor allergens (dust mite, indoor molds, animal allergen) avoidance measures can be extremely effective.  However, avoidance of outdoor allergens is more difficult (although they can be avoided indoors by keeping windows closed (particularly the bedroom window), with central air conditioning, and using medication is usually required.  The single best medication for allergic rhinitis is the topical nasal anti-inflammatories (corticosteroid nasal sprays) which have been shown to be superior to antihistamines and decongestants.  The topical anti-inflammatory nasal sprays are safe when used as directed and are most effective when used regularly to decrease the allergic inflammation and maintain the lining of the nose as close to normal as possible (a similar situation exists in treating asthma).  However, the addition of an antihistamine to nasal anti-inflammatories gives an additive effect for many individuals and represents the common medication combination used for allergic rhinitis.  Please refer to the specific subsection on Avoidance Measures, particularly the Dust/mold Free Bedroom, and to the specific section on Medications, particularly the instruction sheet on how to  use topical nasal sprays ( nobody, including the manufacturers give correct instructions for the use of these sprays -  please see my instruction sheet) and how to use nasal saline solutions.

 

ALLERGIC SINUSITIS

 The respiratory lining continues with no interruption into the sinus cavities.  Please see the details of the individual sinuses in the anatomy section. Allergic sinusitis is extremely common in association with allergic nasal problems and often develops in adults after a number of years of pure nasal symptoms.  Allergic sinusitis is vastly under appreciated and under recognized by the public and physicians alike ( as is the extremely common allergic eustachian tube dysfunction - ear problem). Also, the word sinus means a variety of things to different individuals.  Often when I take a family history for allergy-with negative results, I will then ask if there have been any sinus problems in the family, with a very common response that several individuals in the family have " sinus ".  Medically, sinusitis refers specifically to inflammation in the sinus lining.  The allergic inflammatory response can occur in the sinus respiratory lining just as it can in the nose and chest.  What is often not appreciated is that the allergic process itself causes symptoms without infection being present.  When the sinuses produce excessive mucus, the majority of this mucus goes down the back of the throat as post nasal drip (pnd).  Sometimes pnd is totally asymptomatic (causes no signs or symptoms), but more commonly results in frequent clearing of throat or cough.  As long as the mucus is moved out of the sinus continuously (by the cilia - the fine hairs on the surface cells which move the mucus both from the sinuses and chest) you cannot get a sinus infection.  However, the openings of the sinuses are very small and the allergic inflammatory swelling of the openings (ostia) can result in narrowing or complete closure of the ostia.  When this occurs, mucus builds up in the sinus cavity.  This often results in a pressure sensation, and if the mucus remains in the sinus for a prolonged time it becomes purulent (changes color to yellow or green and smells foul). This purulent colored mucus can ooze out of the narrowed sinus opening resulting in pnd with bad breath or colored mucus when the nose is blown.  The retained mucus in the sinus can become infected and this infection can spread into the sinus lining causing continuous sinus pain usually localized over the infected sinus, and possible fever (from low grade episodic to high continuous).  A sinus infection requires antibiotics, and often for a prolonged period time as you must not only clear the infection from the sinus lining (which has a good blood supply to deliver antibiotics) but also from the retained mucus (which has no blood supply and takes much longer to cure).  What has not been appreciated until recently, is that many antibiotics possess an anti-inflammatory effect and many patients when treated with antibiotics seem to improve and everyone assumes it was an infection, when often it is allergic inflammation that is reduced by the anti-inflammatory effect of the antibiotic.  It is very important not to miss an acute sinus infection as this occasionally can spread into other tissues with severe consequences. Obviously, promoting good drainage of mucus from the sinuses is required to clear infection quickly and to prevent recurrent infections.  What is usually not appreciated is that pure allergic inflammation of the sinus lining can be interpreted as pain.  This pain results in headaches in the cheeks, between or behind the eyes, in the forehead, and any headache located in the face in front of the ears must be considered as being likely sinus in origin.  Individuals with sinus headaches often have totally normal sinus x-rays.  This often leads to this diagnoses being missed and the headaches attributed to common migraine or tension.  So how can you tell if your headache is sinus in origin?  This often depends on a group of other findings.  If you have allergies, have had positive skin testing for inhalant allergens, occasionally have colored sinus discharge or bad breath, have a history of sinus infection or nasal allergy, etc.-the more of these findings the more likely your headache is sinus in origin.  Sinus headaches can often cause nausea and vomiting -the old idea that vomiting always means migraine headache is incorrect.  If your facial headache occurs with any other allergy symptom or if your headache is seasonal - the headache is sinus until proven otherwise.  The other interesting component of allergic sinus disease is the feeling of extreme unwellness, and many of my patients feel like they have the "flu ".  Ultimately, the proof is in the pudding, and proper treatment of your allergies and sinuses should result in a marked improvement in your symptoms.  Sometimes it is exceedingly difficult to tell from the history what is causing a specific facial headache and I will simply tell the patient - " if you have clear cut positive skin tests and standard allergy treatment eliminates your headaches, allergy is the cause ".

 Treatment is quite similar to allergic rhinitis in some aspects.  The initial primary treatment is avoidance of major allergens if at all possible.  Next, it is absolutely essential to use a nasal anti-inflammatory spray and to use it as per my nasal spray instructions.  Several features are critical when using your nasal spray for allergic sinusitis.  The nasal spray reduces allergic inflammation and swelling in the nose AND sinus opening (ostia) only if used properly.  You cannot sniff too hard or you will pull the nasal spray into the throat (we are not treating your stomach!!).  You should never taste the nasal spray.  It should soak into the lining of the side of the nose.  The majority of your sinuses open into the side of the nose.  The biggest mistake my patients make occurs when putting their head sideways - many individuals think their head is truly sideways and it is not.  If I have any question about the individuals technique, I insist that they put their head flat on the kitchen table immediately after spraying that same side of the nose, and they must allow one minute for the spray to adequately soak in.  Please read the detailed nasal spray instructions.  Often immediately after using the nose spray you will experience pronounced post nasal drip (pnd), this is not the nose spray going down your throat (if you followed instructions), merely represents the nose and sinus lining being stimulated to produce extra mucus by the act of spraying itself.  I developed this nasal spray technique myself and have used it on hundreds of patients successfully who had previously used the sprays with little improvement. Details on the safety (they are very safe) of nasal topical anti-inflammatories are found in the treatment section.  Please note that I am not talking about topical decongestant sprays, as these cannot be used continuously without causing problems (rebound congestion).  All topical anti-inflammatory nasal sprays are by prescription and contain corticosteroids. The big difference in treating sinus allergy is the use of oral decongestants.  For allergic rhinitis antihistamines are often a useful addition.  In most adults antihistamines added on top of your nasal spray do not provide significant additional benefit.  (Occasionally, more often in children than adults, antihistamines are effective in controlling the sinuses.  Interestingly, this means that the allergic process in this individual is primarily of the immediate type, as the mast cell, the early phase cell, is the cell that releases histamine, which of course is what antihistamines block.  Another interesting note, is that antihistamines block the histamine receptor, and are much more effective when taken prior to exposures, prior to the initial release of histamine from the mast cell, than taken after the initial allergic reaction when released histamine has already attached itself to the histamine receptor causing fluid, swelling, itching.)  In most sinus patients oral decongestants are the best additional medication.  Oral decongestants can decrease the swelling in the sinus lining and ostia and help decrease mucus secretion.  Oral decongestants can be pure, or can have antihistamines combined with them.  I usually recommend a 12 hour oral decongestant to be taken in the morning, to last the duration of a normal working-school day.  If an individual gets a sinus headache during the day, I usually recommend adding on top, a combination of ibuprofen and oral decongestant (30 mg pseudoephedrine) ( i.e. "Advil cold and sinus").  Oral decongestants should not be used in the evening as they keep most individuals awake or results in extremely light fitful sleep.  Pseudoephedrine has been shown to rarely increase the blood pressure of individuals who have high blood pressure-but I always recommend any individual with hypertension (high blood pressure) should have their blood pressure checked while on pseudoephedrine to ensure it is OK.  Similarly decongestants can increase the pulse rate, and should be used with caution in individuals with a history of rapid heart beat (tachycardia) or palpitations, atrial fibrillation, glaucoma, hyperthyroidism, or urinary difficulties.  Please see the treatment section for a further discussion of oral decongestants and side effects.  Topical nasal decongestants (i.e. DristanTM, OtrivinTM nasal sprays, etc.)  I rarely use except in one circumstance.  If an individual is on full treatment (avoidance, nasal anti-inflammatory spray, daytime oral decongestants) and still is having sinus headaches occur in the night, and I am sure they do not have a sinus infection, I will occasionally recommend the use of a topical decongestant at bedtime (with the same nasal spray technique as outlined above) for a short period of time to provide additional decrease in swelling around the sinus opening.  Note, never should topical decongestants be used twice daily, or rebound congestion rapidly occurs. 

 Individuals who do not respond to standard treatment -avoidance measures and standard medication -are serious candidates for immunotherapy (allergy shots).  This form of treatment is discussed in detail in the Immunotherapy subsection.

 

EARS & ALLERGY

 Although there is a fair amount of information on how respiratory allergies can affect the ears, I am continually amazed at how frequently this information is overlooked.  This is an area seriously undertreated.  The basic anatomy involves the eustachian tube.  This tube originates at the side and back of the nose.  It runs up into the base of the middle ear.  The middle ear is a hollow area behind the eardrum.  When noise hits the eardrum, it vibrates and this vibration is eventually interpreted as sound.  The function of the eustachian tube is to keep the air pressure in the middle ear equal to outside air pressure so the eardrum can vibrate normally.  Please see the diagram of the eustachian tube and middle ear.  The eustachian tube is an extremely complex structure and the explanation that follows is an oversimplification, but gets basic information across.  If allergic inflammation is causing swelling in the nose the eustachian tube entrance at the side of the nose can be involved.  The initial opening of the eustachian tube has the same respiratory lining.  If there is enough swelling of the eustachian tube entrance, it blocks off.  When this occurs a pressure difference occurs between the middle ear (which is now isolated) and the outside air pressure.  If the blockage is mild little bits of air can occasionally move through the blocked area when there is sufficient pressure difference.  This results in the patient experiencing a popping or crackling sensation in their ear (an attempt is being made to make the air pressure equal between the middle ear and the outside).  This situation occurs routinely in individuals in airplanes -particularly on ascent or descent when the change in outside air pressure is rapid.  And as many individuals know, this difference in pressure can cause pain (essentially your eardrum is being pulled inward or pushed outward and if you stretch the eardrum enough it hurts - a lot!!).  In young children the eustachian tube is much narrower than in adults, and blockage of the tube is much more common.  If a young infant has nasal allergy the eustachian tube opening is swollen and narrowed.  This sets up the scenario for recurrent or chronic blockage.  Significant allergic inflammation can by itself cause the eustachian tube entrance to block.  This immediately can cause decreased hearing (the eardrum does not move as well due to the pressure difference) and can cause pain if the pressure difference is significant.  Mucus from the lining of the eustachian tube can build up into the middle ear and the child now has fluid in the middle ear.  If there is sufficient fluid it will push the eardrum outward, cause a red inflammed eardrum, and severe pain.  Note, this can all be caused by allergy.  If the fluid stays the middle ear, over time the chance that this fluid will get infected increases markedly.  If the fluid in the middle ear becomes infected, this child will instantly have a fever.  Now for the most important point, if there is no fever there is no infection in the fluid in the middle ear.  Children who have recurrent " ear infections " with no fever likely have underlying allergies.  What makes matters worse, is that viral infections add to the swelling in the nose making it more likely to have eustachian tube blockage, and in many children "teething" can also have a adverse effect on the eustachian tube (these conditions are additive on top of the allergic inflammation).  Any child who has three ear infections, constant fluid in the middle ear, or episodes of ear pain-fluid with no fever, should be assessed for allergies and allergy tested.  The old idea that young children cannot be allergy tested is wrong, and it is very easy to skin test any infant over six months of age (provided the parent consents and will hold the child appropriately during testing).  Please see the section on skin testing for more details.

 The treatment of allergic-eustachian tube dysfunction is similar to nasal rhinitis.  The primary treatment is avoidance of allergens and irritants.  In infants this particularly applies to dust mites, pets, molds, and the primary irritant is tobacco smoke.  The next step in treatment is using a nasal anti-inflammatory spray to reduce the swelling in the side of the nose, to promote opening of the eustachian tube entrance and drainage of any fluid accumulated.  Antihistamines can be useful to decrease mucus production.  Many allergic children can avoid having multiple courses of antibiotics and a general anesthetic with placement of tubes in the ears with these measures.  Perhaps even more important than this, is that you have identified the child as being atopic (allergic) and that institution of proper avoidance measures (i.e. dust free bedroom, smoke free house, see avoidance section for details) can give this child a significantly better chance of not developing other allergy related problems (sinuses, asthma).  This represents true prevention.  As these children get older, the eustachian tube gets larger, and they often "outgrow" their ear problems by age 3 to 5 years.  However, I am seeing more older children and adults now with this problem, which is in keeping with the fact that allergies are markedly increasing both in frequency and severity.  Some children have very narrow eustachian tubes, and despite all measures they fail to clear the middle ear of fluid (a reasonable time would be within three months), and these children always require tubes in the eardrum to give them normal hearing.  You cannot allow a young infant to go many months to years with significant eustachian tube dysfunction and decreased hearing as this is a critical time for speech development.  I think it's very important parents understand this concept, that if you apply proper avoidance measures and medications and the infant still has fluid in the ear, it must then be dealt with surgically.  However, in my experience most of these children with proper allergy treatment do not need any further intervention.  Admittedly, I do see a biased population, as parents that bring their children to me, suspect allergy in the first place (a sibling or the parents have allergies).

 

ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS – THE EYES

    In this section I will discuss the most common problems that allergy causes in the area of the eyes.  I will not discuss rare allergic conditions that involve the eyes that require treatment and follow-up by an ophthalmologist.

   Allergic conjunctivitis is the most common allergy eye problem.  The conjunctiva is the thin layer of tissue that covers the inside of the eyelids and then travels over the white area of the eyeball (the sclera). The conjunctiva does not cover the cornea (the clear area that you see through). The conjunctiva is part of the eye.  When allergy affects the conjunctiva it virtually always causes significant itching, the conjunctiva usually turns pink-slightly red (usually the conjunctiva is clear and you see the white of the sclera), and this can be associated with an increase in clear tear production.  Acute allergic conjunctival reactions can result in swelling of the conjunctiva which many individuals find very alarming as it seems as if the eyeball itself is swelling (note: the cornea is not involved).  Classic acute conjunctival reactions often occur if an individual is allergic to a pet and the allergy particles that are in the air land directly on the conjunctiva or the allergy particles often can be on the hand (after touching an animal) and then brought up to the eye when this individual rubs their eyelids, adjusts their glasses, etc.  Acute conjunctival reactions often settle within a period of hours.  More prolonged conjunctival reactions are commonly caused by prolonged contact with pollen that is in the air.  This produces the typical seasonal symptoms that can go on for days to weeks during hayfever seasons.  Chronic persistent conjunctivitis occurs when an individual is exposed to an allergen on a chronic basis (often persistent daily exposure to pet allergen). Chronic allergic conjunctivitis often results in more tenacious tear production - the individual develops clear mucus in the eye which is bothersome and can distort vision slightly.  It is very important to note that allergic conjunctivitis does not cause purulent colored mucus in the eye (this is always caused by either a viral or bacterial infections) nor does allergic conjunctivitis cause pain (pain can be a symptom of much more serious eye problems).  The treatment of allergic conjunctivitis can be simple avoidance (if touching a cat and then touching your eye makes your eye itchy you will avoid doing that). If medication is required oral antihistamines can be effective and topical antihistamine eyedrops can be rapidly effective for many individuals (read the separate subsection on how to use Eyedrops).  Antihistamines are always more effective when taken prior to exposure.  There are other additional types of eyedrops that are available for allergic conjunctivitis.  It is also worthwhile noting that the standard corticosteroid nasal sprays we use for allergic rhinitis can also have a beneficial effect on allergic conjunctivitis (making sure there is no contraindication such as glaucoma, viral eye infections, etc.).  If avoidance measures are not practical and medication does not control your conjunctivitis adequately then allergy shots-immunotherapy is often highly effective in eliminating these symptoms.

    I have noticed a substantial increase in periorbital dermatitis over the last few years.  Strictly speaking this problem is not truly an allergy problem of the eye as the area affected is the skin of the upper and lower eyelids.  In this condition the skin of the eyelids becomes red, itchy, can have a variable degree of swelling, and when the process is healing can result in the excessive loss of dry scaly skin in the affected area.  There are two common subtypes and both can severely affect how an individual looks and their self esteem.  The first subtype is a variant of eczema.  This often occurs in individuals that have patches of eczema elsewhere on their body.  Rarely, this can be the only area where the eczema is active.  Allergy can directly drive this process where direct contact with pollen, pet allergen, wood dust, etc. can affect the skin around the eyes.  However, as with eczema in general, other factors than allergy can also drive this process.  Please read the subsection on eczema for a more detailed discussion.  Treatment for this subtype is exactly the same as for eczema elsewhere on the body.  The second subtype is allergic contact dermatitis.  This form of allergy is usually not IgE mediated and is often a form of delayed cellular immune response (similar cellular immune responses can be seen in individuals who are allergic to metals contacting the skin (nickel and chromium being the most common allergens) and in poison ivy). It is important to diagnose this kind of allergic reaction as the typical delayed cellular immune response often takes weeks to complete (classically starts with a red itchy skin, the skin of the eyelids can then swell up, possibly develop blisters, then the skin gradually heals (swelling and redness disappear) while there is a significant loss of dry skin scales in the healing area.  Common causes of this type of allergic reaction are many forms of eye makeup, facial makeup, acrylics (particularly acrylics used in nail polish), components of eyeglasses, and any other allergenic compound that could be touching the eyelid area.  Identifying the causative allergen is critical as this will reaction will continue until the offending allergen has been avoided for several weeks.  If the specific cause of the reaction cannot be found by history, I usually initially eliminate all makeup for a period of one month.  If the eyelid dermatitis disappears, then each specific eye/facial cosmetic is added back in one at a time to determine the offending agent.  Individuals who become allergic to specific facial cosmetics should use as little makeup as possible and always use the same brand of makeup that does not bother them (although manufacturers can change composition).  Hair dyes can cause periorbital dermatitis but usually the scalp is involved in the reaction and the diagnosis is usually easily made (the reaction starts immediately after dye application).  Delayed cellular immune reactions can be proven by patch testing with the suspect allergen on the forearm for a period of 1-3 days.

   A discussion of allergy problems in the eye area would not be complete without talking about allergic shiners (also discussed in the allergic rhinitis section).  Allergic shiners involve only the lower eyelid and typically involve this area becoming dark and swollen (puffy).  This can occur seasonally in people with hayfever, episodically in individuals whose allergies wax and wane, and chronically in individuals with persistent allergic rhinitis.  The blood supply of the lower eyelid drains partially through the nose - when the nose is affected by allergy the lining of the nose swells up and becomes inflamed (allergic rhinitis) and this swelling impedes the flow of blood away from the lower eyelids causing these areas to become dark and swollen.  Identifying allergic shiners gives you a good way to follow nasal allergy (parents can identify how their child's nasal allergy is doing simply by looking for allergic shiners).  Many individuals erroneously attribute allergic shiners to not getting enough sleep/fatigue, but this cause never results in swelling of the lower eyelid (in fact the area often looks sunken) and only occurs with significant sleep deprivation, malnutrition, etc.  If a person has allergic shiners and also a stuffy nose it's a pretty safe bet you're dealing with allergy.

 

 

ALLERGIC LARYNGITIS & TRACHEITIS

 I will spend little time on these two entities.  I do think it is important that you are aware of these.  Both should be suspected if you develop these symptoms seasonally.  In allergic laryngitis, the individual breathes in particles they are allergic to and when the particles land on the vocal cords (larynx) they develop allergic inflammation and a subsequent change in voice/pitch or loss of voice.  Be particularly suspicious of allergy if there is no overuse of the voice (yelling, singing, etc.) or evidence of viral infection.  Many of my allergy patients get mild allergic laryngitis very rapidly on exposures to certain allergens (often mold spores) or some irritants (tobacco smoke, etc.).  Unfortunately, we do not have any specific topical therapy for this area.  The best treatment is avoidance of allergens and irritants that trigger the laryngitis, and resting the voice if it develops.  Occasionally, antihistamines can be useful in high dosage, particularly if taken prior to exposure to prevent allergic laryngitis.  I should also mention that using inhaled anti-inflammatory corticosteroids for asthma can cause a hoarse voice if a spacer is not used properly with puffers and/or proper  gargle and rinse procedures are not done after inhaler use.  Allergic tracheitis presents as a dry cough only, often seasonal in nature, lasting several weeks with no evidence of infection.  The cough is often made worse with exposure to cold air or irritants but never causes true shortness of breath.  It's not unusual to have mild central chest discomfort with this entity and you have to be careful in older individuals to rule out heart disease.  However, allergic tracheitis does occur, and in many individuals I have followed for years, eventually true asthma has developed (the allergic inflammation has moved down further into the smaller tubes in the lungs).  The treatment of allergic tracheitis is identical to asthma, as anti-inflammatory inhalers do a good job, and often treatment is only required seasonally.  Individuals with allergic tracheitis have consistently normal lung function, with or without symptoms.

 

ASTHMA

 There are huge resources available regarding asthma.   For a detailed discussion of asthma, GINA (the Global Initiative for Asthma) is excellent and any of the national asthma programs (Canada,USA,UK) provide up to date info and guidelines online.  Please read over my discussion on The Allergic Process and my Overview of respiratory allergy before continuing here.

 Although the vast majority of asthma is initiated by the allergic inflammatory process, and many individuals continue to have their asthma driven by allergy, there are small sub groups that do not fall into this category.  As we have already discussed, asthma is a chronic inflammatory process that occurs in the medium and smaller tubes of the lung.  This inflammatory process results in the tubes becoming overly sensitive to a variety of allergic, irritant, and physical stimuli.  When these tubes are exposed to one or more of these stimuli they narrow down.  This narrowing of the tubes results in difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, or wheezing.  One of the characteristics of asthma is that this narrowing (bronchocostriction) is reversible either spontaneously or with medication.  For many years the diagnosis and treatment of asthma concentrated on the bronchocostriction aspect of asthma.  We now realize that the basic underlying process is inflammation within the tubes in the lung and the current treatment of asthma focuses on reducing and controlling this inflammatory process.  If the inflammation in the tubes is well controlled the asthmatic will have minimal to no symptoms.  We also know that this inflammatory process is not benign for some asthmatics can result in permanent damage to these tubes (i.e. scarring in the tubes and permanent changes such as an increase in muscle tissue in these tubes, which is called remodelling, which results in a permanent loss of lung function).  Some individuals with asthma lose lung function faster than normal individuals/many asthmatics and this lost lung function is not retrievable.  This is why it is so important to begin the treatment of asthma with anti-inflammatories early in the process to not only reduce or eliminate symptoms but to attempt to reduce loss of lung function through a comprehensive approach by treating asthma, treating other concomitant allergy problems (nose, sinus, skin), appropriate allergen avoidance measures, immunotherapy (allergy shots), etc.  A concept I want you to retain regarding asthma treatment is that eliminating the bronchocostriction results in improved airflow through the tubes and an improvement in lung function, but if we reduce the inflammatory swelling in the tubes, this results in a further improvement in lung capacity and function and decreases the frequency and severity of episodes of bronchoconstriction.  Another concept I want you to have is how chronic asthma is; even if there are no symptoms, this inflammatory process usually continues.  I like to compare asthma to an engine with an unlimited fuel supply.  Allergy is the process that turns the engine on in children and most adults (occasionally in adults major chemical exposures can do this, and occasionally viral infections likely can do this also).  Once the engine has been turned on it continues to run on its own.  We do not have the key to turn the engine off.  If the engine is idling the individual has few symptoms.  Subsequent exposures to allergens (things the asthmatic is allergic to-particularly airborne allergens) or viral infections step on the accelerator, speed the engine up, and create more symptoms.  With proper allergy avoidance measures and appropriate anti-inflammatory treatment, the engine will tend to always idle.

 So why has it proved to be so difficult to treat asthma?  There are numerous studies that show asthma is consistently under diagnosed and under treated.  We also know there has been a huge increase in the incidence of asthma and the severity of asthma throughout all age groups.  This has huge implications for the future.  There is a significant hereditary aspect to asthma.  If one or both parents have asthma, the risk of asthma is significantly higher in the child with mom tending to pass down a higher risk to each of her children.  Asthma is a highly variable disease.  It can start in very early infancy with obvious episodes of wheezing.  Often this is seen with viral infections and children with asthma often tend to have prolonged symptoms (wheezing, coughing, difficulty breathing) after a cold.  Many young children who were diagnosed as asthmatic, will "outgrow" their asthma in later childhood and continue into early adulthood with no symptoms.  However, these individuals usually have abnormal pulmonary function testing (PFT) and often develop asthmatic symptoms in later adulthood again.  Many young infants wheeze with viral infection simply because the infection itself causes inflammation and swelling in the tubes which results in wheezing.  Remember, wheezing is a high pitched whistling sound that comes from the chest and is caused by the small and medium sized airways being narrowed by any cause.  Although, wheezing has other causes, it still remains the single symptom, that when present over time is clearly associated with the correct diagnosis of asthma.  The initial symptoms of asthma are highly variable.  Sometimes the only evidence of asthma is coughing.  The cough often occurs at night with the child clearly having no viral infection or on exposure to cold air, exercise, or emotional extremes (i.e., laughing, crying, anger, etc.).  In young children we cannot do any formal testing to prove asthma exists.  The diagnoses in young children rests on symptoms, having a high suspicion (i.e. parents who have asthma, family history of allergy), having clear cut significant positive skin tests (children and most adults with asthma have very significant positive skin tests), and a clear cut response to wheezing with treatment (using openers to reverse bronchoconstriction) or a response to all symptoms with anti-inflammatory medication (inhaled steroids).  In older children (5 to 6 years old) and adults it is somewhat easier to make the diagnosis.  Everything mentioned already applies, but now you can do lung function testing (PFT-pulmonary function testing, spirometry).  In undertreated or untreated asthma you can often see evidence of asthma on an initial PFT (the FEV1 (ability to move air out of the chest in one second) is often reduced well below expected value for that individual, particularly in relation to total lung capacity (FVC)).  A standard definition of asthma for many, is that the FEV1 must improve by 15 to 20% after using a bronchodilator medication  (opener, beta agonists).  However, this creates a real problem.  What do you call the individuals who only improve 12% or 9% (you get the picture).  They still have inflammation in their tubes.  This definition of asthma is convenient for asthma studies, but does not include many individuals who require treatment (especially milder asthmatics).  Another way to diagnose asthma is to measure lung function (do a PFT) then deliberately irritate the tubes by breathing in a substance that usually irritates the tubes of asthmatics (a methacholine or histamine challenge) and demonstrating narrowing of the tubes (a decrease in FEV1 of 15 to 20%).  While this is usually positive in asthmatics, it still likely misses some individuals with mild inflammation and can be positive in individuals who do not have asthma.  Many asthma experts require a positive methacholine challenge to call the disease process asthma.  However, I feel the best way to diagnose asthma in individuals who are suspect, is to document an improvement in PFT and symptoms over time by instituting proper avoidance measures and treating the individual with anti-inflammatory medication.  This concept is critical; that repeat PFTs over time will show an improvement.  It's important for any asthmatic to understand, that a PFT done at any given moment, only reflects the inflammation in their lungs at that specific moment, and that their PFT varies over time just as the amount of inflammation varies over time.  Another less accurate way of assessing lung function is the peak flow meter.  This instrument is inexpensive, portable, and can be used by the asthmatic at home, and measures the peak expiratory flow rate (PEF).  While this is useful for some asthmatics (particularly asthmatics who do not perceive changes in their lungs or parents of younger children who cannot tell their parents how their chest is) it has certain major drawbacks.  The readings are highly dependent on consistent technique (a major problem with some children) and effort and the PEF measures the airflow through the larger tubes.  A peak flow meter is a useful instrument for any asthmatic or parent provided they wish to use it.  However, compliance in taking medication regularly is a huge problem and using a peak flow meter represents another activity the asthmatic has to do, and for a large group of asthmatics is not absolutely essential as long as the asthmatic can maintain good control of their asthma continuously.

 Making matters even more difficult, is that asthma likely represents a group of inflammatory disorders.  By this I mean that it is likely that there are basic differences in the inflammatory process in certain groups of asthmatics.  All asthmatics have chronic inflammation, but there is mounting evidence that certain asthmatics differ from others in the type or relative amounts of certain inflammatory cells (and the chemicals they release) and this is why some asthmatics will respond better than others to a specific medication.  Taking all this into consideration, the fact remains that many asthmatics remain undiagnosed or undertreated.

 Once asthma has been diagnosed, the treatment should be straightforward.  Once again the primary treatment is avoidance of allergens and irritants that drive the inflammatory process in the tubes.  A special mention should be made about specific entities.  In the large majority of children with asthma, dust mite allergy drives the allergic process and the child's asthma.  In individuals who are allergic to dust mites (proven by skin testing), eliminating exposure to dust mite allergen in the bedroom particularly (the dust free bedroom, see this in the avoidance section) reduces the asthmatics symptoms and medication use in the long term.  Dust mite allergy is a chronic driving force behind allergic inflammation.  Particularly, there is evidence that strict avoidance of dust mite allergen in young infants and children can reduce the development of respiratory allergic disease (asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis).  This is very important, as we can prevent the development of asthma in some children (and likely reduce the severity in the rest) with simple avoidance measures.  We know that exposure to tobacco smoke (primarily an irritant, with over 4000 separate chemical components) increases the risk and severity of asthma.  No child should be exposed to second hand tobacco smoke, and particularly no child with a family history of allergies or asthma should ever be exposed to second hand tobacco smoke as we know this irritant causes more severe symptoms in allergic individuals.  Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) can double a child's risk of asthma.  All smoking parents (and relatives, friends) must always smoke outside the house and never in enclosed spaces (like the family car).  A special mention should be made about molds.  For a detailed discussion on mold spores, see the section on Allergens & Irritants.  We know that young children who are allergic to mold spores diagnosed by skin testing) tend to have more persistent and severe asthma.  Reduction of mold spores and dust mite and pet allergen requires removal of carpeting, as carpets represent a major reservoir for these allergens.  Cleaning any areas that are obviously moldy and keeping the house dry are also essential.  Significant mold contamination requires removal of all affected housing material using appropriate protection precautions. In children who are allergic to cats or dogs (or other pets, again diagnosed by a clear exposure history and skin testing) exposure to this allergen also drives the allergic inflammatory process, increasing the risk of developing and the severity of asthma.  Removal of the pet is clearly the best solution as it takes many months even after pet & carpet removal and appropriate washing to eliminate allergens from the house.  Details can be found in the Avoidance subsection.  If the pet cannot be removed extensive pet control measures will be required for pet allergic individuals (see the Pet Control Measures subsection).

 Next, we want to use anti-inflammatory medication to get the inflammatory process under control and then control the chronic inflammation well to prevent symptoms from appearing.  The fast acting openers (beta agonists) should be used whenever an asthmatic feels there chest is tight, is short of breath, or wheezing.  The use of your opener is a good measure of asthma control.  When you have a viral infection many asthmatics will require their opener frequently (perhaps every 4 hours) and if you need it, you use it.  For specific details on all these medications see the Medication section.  However, good asthma control is attained (in other words you are controlling the inflammatory process well) if you use your opener once a week or less and in the majority of asthmatics this is attainable with a combination of proper avoidance measures and appropriate medication.  Initially you use high dosage anti-inflammatories to get the inflammation under control.  This means you use oral prednisone or high dosage inhaled corticosteroids.  The mistake often made is that as soon as symptoms (wheeze, cough, etc.) have disappeared the anti-inflammatory medication is reduced too early.  Prednisone is only used for the acute flare, usually 7 to 14 days worth (except in a few of the most severe asthmatics who may require regular prednisone for adequate control).  However, high dose inhaled corticosteroids (which are safer), should be continued for a period weeks-months to get the process under good control, prior to reducing the inhaled steroid dose.  We know that when symptoms disappear, the inflammatory process lags at least six to eight weeks behind before settling back to well controlled minimal inflammation.  In many asthmatics who are undertaking avoidance measures for the first time or have significant seasonal or occupational exposure it takes many months to get the inflammatory process under control (it's not unusual for this to take six months to two years) and only when the inflammatory process is under good control should you decrease your inhaled steroids to low dose.  We determine good control by a lack of symptoms and an improved and stable PFT.  In the long run, we want the individual to be on low dose inhaled corticosteroids, as we know this is safe.  Even low dose inhaled steroids can prevent scarring (loss of lung function) in most asthmatics.  We want to avoid the long term side effects of high dose inhaled steroids (small but increased risk of osteoporosis, thin bruising skin, glaucoma, cataracts).  Another way of looking at long-term steroid use, is that the majority of the beneficial effect of inhaled steroids (reducing frequency of flares &hospitalization, improving lung function, improving quality of life, etc.) is attained at low doses and increasing the long term dose of inhaled steroids above low doses increases the side effects of the steroids without providing significant further improvement in asthma control.  Remember, we are controlling an inflammatory process that if not controlled can permanently damage the lungs resulting in loss of lung function.  There is a group of very severe asthmatics that appear to continue to lose lung function despite using all available medications (including steroids).  Should asthma symptoms not come under rapid control with the above measures, the next step is to add in an additional anti-inflammatory.  We now have available the leukotriene receptor blockers (Accolate, Singulair) that have anti-inflammatory and opener (bronchodilating) properties.  One of these medications should be tried in addition to continuing inhaled steroids.  These medications work very quickly, usually effect is seen within two days, and if effective can allow a more rapid reduction in inhaled steroids.  Unfortunately, these leukotriene receptor blockers only work in approximately half of the asthmatic population (it is genetically determined - you either do or do not respond).  When they do work, they allow a significant reduction in long term inhaled steroid use and also have beneficial effects on the upper airways (nose,sinuses).  The improvement in asthma with leukotriene receptor blockers should result in a significant reduction in symptoms and proven by an improvement in lung function (PFT).  These new medications are expensive, have a good safety profile, and if one leukotriene receptor blocker does not work, it is very likely the other will not work also.  If there is no response to the leukotriene receptor blockers the next step is usually to add in a long acting opener which can improve asthma control (long acting beta agonists - LABAs: OxeseTM, SereventTM (or their respective steroid combinations SymbicortTM, AdvairTM, ZenhaleTM).  These long acting openers are taken every 12 hours and have been shown to reduce asthma symptoms while improving lung function and quality of life.  LABAs when used regularly must always be taken with an inhaled steroid (used alone regularly they can increase the risk of severe/fatal asthma attacks).  So far these long acting openers have also been shown to be safe, with minimal side effects (tremor, increased pulse, headache being the commonest).  Long acting openers -LABAs do not possess any anti-inflammatory properties, do not improve upper airway symptoms, but do work for all asthmatics.  I feel it makes imminent sense to treat the basic inflammatory process maximally (with proper avoidance and anti-inflammatories), before using other medications.  At this point, most asthmatics (well over 90%) should be under good control and using their as necessary short acting beta agonist (opener) less than once per week, exercising normally, and having no asthma symptoms that interfere with work, pleasure, or sleep.  Excellent control is achieved when an opener use is less than once per month.

 In asthmatics still not under good control, there are other medications that can be tried (i.e. theophylline).  A new monoclonal antibody to IgE has become available (omalizumab-“Xolair”TM), but is very expensive and only applicable for a small minority of severe allergic asthmatics.  Also, consideration can be given, in asthmatics who have clear cut unavoidable allergy driving their asthma, to immunotherapy (allergy shots). However, and this is a huge however, asthmatics who have not come under control with the above measures usually are not following their treatment plan.  Many asthmatics do not comply with proper avoidance measures.  I strongly feel every asthmatic should be allergy tested to identify the specific allergens they have to avoid and to be properly educated in proper avoidance measures and equipment.  It is not appropriate to tell an asthmatic to get rid of pets, carpets, etc. without the objective proof of specific allergy determined history and appropriate skin testing.  I would encourage you to read the section on allergy skin testing as this must be done properly and if done incorrectly can cause significant long term problems (particularly if the patient is told they have no allergies).  This being said, many asthmatics do not practice proper avoidance measures.  The bedroom remains a source of dust mite-mold-animal allergen, the pet they are allergic to remains in the house, and so on.  You cannot expect good asthma control with continuing exposures to major allergens.  Compliance with medication use is also a huge problem both from the physician and patient point of view.  There still are physicians who are hesitant to prescribe inhaled steroids and particularly a large number who use steroids intermittently.  The intermittent use of steroids is unacceptable for most persistent asthmatics.  The exception to this will be discussed below.  Many patients fear the word steroid and corticosteroids are anti-inflammatories and are not to be confused with anabolic steroids.  While long-term prednisone use and high dose inhaled use clearly have detrimental long-term effects (prednisone far more so than inhaled) the short term use of these steroids (prednisone for two weeks or high dose inhaled steroids for several months) is quite safe.  Low dose maintenance inhaled steroids are exceedingly safe.  Nonetheless, many patients do not take these medications regularly (some never take them) and the inflammatory process is never adequately controlled.  Many studies have shown patients routinely do not admit to physicians that they are not taking their medication properly.  Another sadly overlooked area is that of inhaler technique.  Many studies have shown that the majority of patients, physicians, and pharmacists do not have or remember correct inhaler technique.  You cannot expect the asthmatic to use their inhalers properly if they have never been shown how to do it correctly.  Moreover, many studies have shown that even with correct initial technique, many patients subsequently fall into incorrect technique over time.  The most difficult asthmatic patients are individuals who have had asthma for years and know how to do everything correctly.  They don't realize that the treatment of asthma, including inhalers, technique, and medication continually is evolving with new understanding and better equipment.  This is where patient and physician education is critical, for only if you realize this field is constantly progressing and improving with time, and only if this translates into increased knowledge will you get optimal treatment and then get optimal results.  When all this has been taken into account there remains several specific things that can continue to drive asthma and cause poor control.  Ongoing allergic inflammation in the nose makes asthma worse (primarily through a nerve reflex, making the nerves that supply the lungs overactive, and contributing to narrowing (these are the same nerves that cause an asthma attack when you laugh, cry, etc.)).  Allergic sinusitis (with or without infective sinusitis) always drives asthma and must be treated.  Pnd (post nasal drip) may worsen some asthmatics but more commonly causes cough.  A badly overlooked area is acid reflux.  This term reflux refers to acid from the stomach moving back up the esophagus (the tube you swallow food down).  There is an exceptionally high amount of reflux in asthmatics.  What is interesting is that over 30% of patients with significant reflux have no -that's zero -symptoms of heartburn.  Although, the occasional patient with reflux is so severe that the acid travels all the way up the esophagus into the back of the throat (directly irritating the airway), in the vast majority of people with reflux the acid irritates the nerves of the lower esophagus (remember no symptoms necessary) which causes an increase in the nerve input to the lungs and consequent increase in irritability of the tubes of the lungs.  If reflux is suspected as a contributing factor in difficult to control asthma a trial of medication to reduce acid production in the stomach is warranted.  A positive trial for reflux would improve asthma symptoms and improve the PFT (while holding all other variables constant).  In this context, only our most powerful acid reducing agents in maximum dose should be used for this trial, intermediate acid reduction agents are not appropriate.

 Some brief comments on inhalers are appropriate.  The most common inhalers are the MDIs (metered dose inhalers) or the "puffer ".  Most inhaled steroid puffers must be used with a spacer device (AerochamberTM, etc.).  These spacer devices reduce the amount of residual steroid in the mouth and allow for improved deposition in the tubes of the lung.  Using a puffer alone you get approximately 6% of the total dose in your lungs, while using a spacer and puffer you get approximately 15% in your lungs (although this varies between spacers).  These numbers changed with the elimination of  CFC propellant in MDIs (which now use HFA as a propellant).  Most require that you shake your puffer vigorously before each puff to get an adequate dose, and if you have not used your puffer in two days you will not get full dose on the first puff.  Once your inhaler is adequately shaken and in the spacer you breathe out, put your lips over the spacer mouthpiece, and press down firmly on your puffer and start breathing in at the same time.  Note: you must breathe in slowly and steadily (over approximately 2 to 3 seconds) and fully to get optimal deposition (and be standing to take a full breath in).  You must hold the puff in your chest for a minimum of 6 seconds – I prefer 10 seconds or as long as you can.  Holding less than 10 seconds results in medication being lost as you breathe back out (exhale).  Everyone, particularly adults, should check their hold time with a watch to ensure you are continuing to hold for 10 seconds.  Young children are very good once they know how to count 10 seconds on the clock.  Adults and teens are always in a hurry.  You repeat this technique for every single puff.  After inhaling steroids, you must take a good mouthful of water, gargle deeply, rinse the mouth, then spit out.  The inhaled steroid should only be deposited in your lungs.  Using an opener puffer alone, which is what everyone does away from home as they don't want to take their spacer with them, is not a major problem, as less than optimal inhaler technique can be compensated for by taking an extra puff.  All I will say about this technique, is that you should use your mouth as the "spacer" and you must inhale faster (approximately 1 second) to capture the opener medication.  Timing is critical as you should press on the puffer just as you start your breath in. We now have available multiple dry powder inhalers.  All these dry powder inhalers require the individual to pull the powdered medication into their lungs.  Many of these inhalers are more efficient (for example, the TurbuhalerTM (Symbicort,Pulmicort, Bricanyl, OxeseTM) can deposit 30% of the inhaled medication in the lungs with proper technique).  These medications contain no CFCs so are environmentally friendly also.  All these dry powder inhalers (TurbuhalerTM, DiskusTM, AsmanexTM, etc.) require the patient to breathe out as far as possible (exhale completely), get a very tight seal over the mouthpiece with their lips, then inspire (breathe in) as hard and long as possible (you want to generate as high an airflow rate through the device as you can and continue to inhale through the device until your lungs are completely full of air  & you must be standing to generate a full breath in),  and you once again hold the medication in your lungs for 10 seconds before exhaling.  Similarly, all inhaled steroids require a good gargle-rinse afterwards.  You must be very careful not to breathe into (exhale into) these devices just as you are getting ready or you will blow the powder away.  Further comments on specific inhalers are in the medication section.  Probably, the most important thing to remember regarding inhalers, is that each specific inhaler device, spacer, etc. has its own unique properties and most require a specific unique technique to use optimally.

 

Reprinted with permission,Dr. Bruce Sweet, 2014