FOOD ALLERGY

There is likely no area that is as badly misunderstood as that of true food allergy. Many adverse reactions to foods have been blamed on allergy. Many examples exist : drinking too much caffeine and getting a tremor, nausea, etc.; eating tyramine containing foods (red wine, some cheeses) and getting a migraine headache, and so on. Similarly, toxic reactions to food have been blamed on allergy (for example: ingesting certain seafood contaminated with a variety of toxins). Please go back to the start of the Allergic Respiratory Diseases section and review the basic Allergic Process prior to continuing here.

While there are occasional delayed reactions to foods, the usual IgE mediated reaction to food occurs within seconds to minutes, and certainly usually within an hour. Immediate (within seconds) food reactions usually are fairly evident. If every time you try to eat a peanut, your lips and mouth swell and get itchy, you likely are allergic to peanuts. The common reactions to food allergy usually occur in the skin or digestive system: having your lips swell, developing hives or a red itchy rash on the face or the rest of the body, eczema appearing or getting worse, tongue and throat swelling or getting itchy, abdominal cramps, vomiting, diarrhea, and so on. If multiple systems are involved in the reaction, particularly the chest (wheezing, difficulty breathing) or the vascular system (fainting, pale, weak and sweating) this reaction represents anaphylaxis. However, many food allergies only cause skin or abdominal symptoms.

The most important point to remember is that any suspected food allergy must be confirmed with appropriate testing. There are very few exceptions to this rule, the only exception should be an ultra severe life threatening anaphylactic reaction to a specific food coupled with a clear cut history, where avoidance of this food has prevented any further reactions. I will give you an example to illustrate this point. An individual goes to a restaurant, eats an entire dinner, which included shrimp, and immediately after the dinner developed a generalized rash and had vomiting and diarrhea. If this person goes to the average emergency department, after appropriate treatment, they will be told to avoid shrimp and are given a prescription for an EpipenTM. For the rest of this person's life, they avoid shrimp and possibly all seafood. This individual should always be tested to prove they are allergic to shrimp. In this particular case skin testing was totally negative to shrimp and all seafood. Negative skin testing is highly accurate for most foods in proving no IgE allergy exists, particularly, if fresh food is used for the skin testing. This individual did have a major positive skin test to Anisakis Simplex - a seafood parasite - a common cause of "seafood allergy". This person can continue to enjoy shrimp and other seafood, however, must be prepared to treat an allergic reaction as they may eat seafood contaminated with this parasite in the future. The bottom line is that things are often not what they seem in food allergy. The other point is that patients are seldom shown how to use an EpipenTM , and are never capable of using it properly during an emergency situation.  Unless someone clearly understands how to use their EpipenTM under normal circumstances, they certainly will never use it properly during an emergency situation. I have every patient demonstrate how to use their EpipenTM when I initially see them in my office, and over 90% do not demonstrate correct technique. Skin testing is used to confirm a previous reaction to a food as being truly allergic or can guide dietary manipulation and testing to see if a specific positive skin test indicates true food allergy. This is very important to understand. Many individuals will develop positive skin tests to cow’s milk when they first encounter cow’s milk as a baby, and this skin test persists as positive for many years. Many of these people never had any clinical allergy to cow’s milk and can drink milk with no problems. The point being made is that having a positive skin test to a food must not be interpreted as indicating clinical allergy AND must have the appropriate dietary manipulation done to prove that true allergy exists.

The ideal way to prove food allergy is to perform a double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBFC). In this testing the person taking the suspect food and the investigator giving the food challenge do not know the contents of each capsule (usually capsules are used so the patient cannot taste the food) and the results are interpreted by a third party who knows the actual contents of each capsule. Placebo reactions to foods are exceedingly common where an individual is so afraid or convinced of a specific food that they experience symptoms eating a suspect food (when the actual food eaten was not what they thought it was). There are two chief problems with this procedure. The first is that this is an extremely expensive and time consuming procedure. The second is that certain food allergies wax and wane (in other words, at certain times an individual can experience an allergic reaction to a specific food and at other times will eat that food with no symptoms evident). The good point of DBFC is that it clearly shows which individuals are experiencing placebo reactions and these individuals can be clearly told they do not have to avoid this specific food. Perhaps the greatest risk of food allergy diagnosis is that an individual will avoid a specific food (often a very important food from a nutritional point of view) for prolonged periods of time risking malnutrition and inadequate diet.


TESTING  SPECIFIC  FOOD(S)

So how do we attempt to diagnose food allergy in a practical way.  If you have had a severe-anaphylactic reaction to a food you should have a clear cut positive skin test to that particular food, with negative skin tests to a variety of other foods.

 If you have less specific reactions (for example mild itching, abdominal bloating, occasional diarrhea) I usually skin test suspected foods first.  If there are several positive skin tests to foods that could fit the specific history or if the patient is convinced a specific food may be causing a problem, I have the patient complete an elimination-rechallenge diet at home.  Note: this cannot be done if you suspect severe allergy.  The process is quite simple. The patient strictly avoids a specific food for one week (occasionally longer).  It is absolutely critical that the suspect food be strictly avoided, and this is where the major problem lies. Many individuals cheat on their diet or unknowingly eat the food to be avoided (for example in a sauce, remembering that food labeling in Canada is not all inclusive). However, assuming complete avoidance of that specific food for one week, if the person is allergic to the avoided food there will be a significant improvement in their symptoms. After the avoidance phase, the next morning the person gets up and eats only the suspect food and water (the food eaten should be pure with no other foods/spices contaminating it). Over the next two to three hours, after eating the suspect food, all the original symptoms should come back. This is very clear cut (for example: you would get extreme diarrhea). You must clearly improve on the avoidance phase, and clearly have symptoms return upon rechallenge.  If we are looking at eczema, the reintroduced food should be eaten several times over a period of 2 days before assuming there is no reaction.  This entire procedure should be carried out again.  Only if this entire sequence is reliably repeatable, should the diagnosis of specific food allergy be considered.  Results of this kind of allergy testing must always be reviewed by a physician familiar with these procedures before making an absolute diagnosis of food allergy/senstitivity.  If the particular food represents a major food staple, referral to a registered dietician is often a good idea, to ensure the patient continues with a balanced and nutritionally adequate diet.

If the patient is having bowel problems and the question being asked is – “Could foods be playing a role in my bowel problem” – then a full elimination diet is often performed.  There is a subsection in this Contents section that reviews aspects of the Elimination diet.  Essentially, I have the patient avoid all possible allergenic foods for 1 week.  This often means a very restricted diet of water, salt, rice, chicken for a week or some variation of this.  If this diet is adhered to completely (very difficult) and there is one or more foods causing bowel problems, the bowel problems will disappear after 2 days on this diet.  If (and only if) clear improvement is seen, then we start on a reintroduction phase, adding in one new food at a time in a specific order to find the problem food(s).  This is a very tough diet, but many individuals are willing to carry this out to get an answer as to whether foods are the cause of their bowel problems.  This full elimination diet cannot be performed without Dr. Sweet going over the diet prior to starting to ensure adequate nutrition, AND then requires continuous follow-up during the entire diet (I usually do this via email).  A full elimination diet should never be performed without full medical supervision and interpretation of results.

IT GETS COMPLICATED

The following section outlines other possible reactions to food.  I would like to stress that this section does not deal with other medical nonfood related bowel problems such as IBD (inflammatory bowel disease comprising Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and their variants), bowel cancers, ulcers, and so on. Most patients I see for possible food allergies have already had an appropriate work up for other bowel related medical problems (scopes, ultrasounds, X-rays, etc.).  Another way of looking at this is that individuals often consider the possibility of food allergy after everything else has been ruled out (and this is certainly appropriate to make sure you are not dealing with inflammatory bowel disease, cancer, etc.).  The initial portion of this section deals with IgE mediated food allergy.  There are other forms of reactions to foods both allergic and non-allergic which can cause bowel and systemic problems.  If an individual has chronic bowel problems (abdominal bloating-swelling, nausea, cramps-pain, vomiting, diarrhea) that are not caused by IgE mediated allergy they could be caused by the following:

1-Local Bowel Allergy- In this instance you have a true IgE mediated allergic reaction to a food, but this reaction is limited only to the lining of the bowel.  Skin testing is negative for IgE food allergy because this is not a systemic allergy.  There are no IgE antibodies to the specific food in the rest of that individual (particularly in the skin) so skin testing is negative.  In most individuals with IgE mediated disease (hayfever, asthma, anaphylaxis, eczema) the IgE antibody is throughout the body and so skin testing is positive.  This phenomenon of local IgE allergy exists in the nose and accounts for a significant number of individuals who have non-allergic rhinitis (i.e. their skin testing is negative).  This is important to know about as standard allergy medications can be beneficial for these individuals.

2-Other Immune Reactions- There are other antibodies that can be produced against foods.  In particular IgA and IgG (possibly IgM) antibodies can be directed against foods.  Cell mediated allergy (delayed allergy) can also occur against various foods.  Many medications that are useful for IgE allergy are not useful here.  However, medications that work against multiple areas in the immune system (steroids, etc.) and certain anti-inflammatory medications can be helpful.

3-Non-Immune Reactions- These reactions to foods comprise a huge number of adverse/idiosyncratic reactions.  Examples of such reactions would be direct reactions to chemicals found in foods (i.e. caffeine, tyramine, etc.); the increase in gas, distention, and loose bowel movements caused by high-fiber in diets, fatty foods stimulating gallbladder attacks or diarrhea, and so on. Usually avoidance or a reduction in the amount of these offending foods will eliminate symptoms.  Medication is rarely required.

4- Lactose Intolerance-  A special mention should be made about lactose intolerance.  Lactose is the natural sugar found in cow’s milk and milk products. Lactose intolerance is an extremely common condition affecting some children and up to 30% of adults. The enzyme responsible for handling lactose- “lactase” (splits the lactose molecule into simple sugars that can be absorbed) in the bowel lining becomes depleted. When a lactose intolerant individual drinks milk or eats milk products with lactose in them, lactose is not digested, stays in the bowel, pulls fluid into the bowel, causing abdominal cramps, bloating, and often loose bowel movements/diarrhea. This can be diagnosed quite easily at home provided you keep in mind the reasons for failure that I mentioned above. You should strictly avoid milk products for 5-7 days. After an avoidance period, on a Saturday morning (not on a school day or workday) you sit down and over a 1-2 hour period, drink at least half a liter or more of LactaidTM or LactesseTM milk. In these milk products the lactose has been pretreated with lactase with the lactose pretreated. Do not eat or drink anything else.  If you have no problems 2 to 3 hours after this, you are not allergic to milk (because LactaidTM or LactesseTM contain all the milk proteins that cause true allergy). The next morning, Sunday, you get up and drink at least half a liter or more of regular milk. If you have lactose intolerance, you will get abdominal cramps, bloating, and so on. Lactose intolerance can be treated by taking LactaidTM tablets-drops, etc. with milk products and you do not have to avoid milk products. One further point should be made. Individuals vary tremendously in the severity of their lactose intolerance, and some require one or two tablets with milk products, whereas some require considerably more tablets while still experiencing symptoms.

5- Celiac Disease- A special mention also should be made about “gluten-wheat-gliadin-Coeliac” - Celiac Disease. This chronic disease is also highly variable in its presentation. The classical form results in chronic diarrhea and malabsorption. The non classical forms are much more difficult to diagnose, and some individuals do not have any symptoms develop for decades.  Recent advances in blood tests indicate that possibly between one and two percent of the population can have this problem, whether it's symptomatic or not. This is an immune IgA and IgG mediated disease. The IgA and IgG antibodies are directed against gliadin (a molecule that is found in wheat, rye, barley). The gold standard for diagnosis is still the small bowel biopsy done while the individual is actively eating wheat and related food products, but a blood test is now available that screens quite accurately for Celiac Disease (patient has to pay for the test).  Note; the person must be eating gluten regularly to be able to diagnose Celiac Disease whether by biopsy or blood test.  Testing cannot be performed – results are not reliable- if an individual has been strictly avoiding wheat-gluten.  True wheat allergy, IgE mediated, does exist, but it is much less common (these individuals have a positive skin test to wheat (i.e. IgE antibody to wheat) and negative testing for Celiac Disease).  Further discussion of Celiac Disease is not warranted here, but it certainly is a diagnosis I often consider in certain individuals who feel they may have "food allergies".  There are several good web sites Re: Celiac Disease and a simple web search will find these.

SUMMARY

  Persons suspected of having food allergies, must have their suspect allergy proven by appropriate tests done or supervised by a physician experienced in this area. This particular area is frequently overlooked. Treatment of food allergy revolves around avoidance of that particular food and any foods that may be contaminated by that food. For severe food allergy, an epinephrine auto injector (EpipenTM/TwinjectTM) is mandatory. The individual must know how to use their auto injector and young children should carry their own on their person as soon as they are capable. Go to the Contents page and the EpiPenTM-TwinjectTM section for a discussion of this treatment aspect.

End  Dr. Bruce Sweet 2012